|
|
Pennsylvania Likely Voters |
| If next week's election for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania were held today, whom would you support if the candidates are: [If undecided: If you had to decide today, are you leaning more towards:] |
| Joe Sestak, the Democratic candidate |
Pat Toomey, the Republican candidate |
Other |
Undecided |
| Row % |
Row % |
Row % |
Row % |
| Pennsylvania Likely Voters |
45% |
52% |
1% |
2% |
| Party ID |
Democrat |
89% |
9% |
1% |
1% |
| Republican |
8% |
91% |
<1% |
1% |
| Independent |
40% |
51% |
3% |
7% |
| Tea Party Supporters |
10% |
89% |
1% |
<1% |
| Enthusiasm About Voting Next Week |
Very enthusiastic |
37% |
61% |
1% |
2% |
| Somewhat enthusiastic |
59% |
39% |
1% |
1% |
| Not enthusiastic |
62% |
29% |
1% |
7% |
| Political Ideology |
Liberal |
87% |
8% |
1% |
3% |
| Moderate |
58% |
38% |
2% |
2% |
| Conservative |
15% |
85% |
<1% |
1% |
| Region |
Philadelphia |
82% |
9% |
3% |
6% |
| Philadelphia Suburbs |
49% |
49% |
<1% |
2% |
| Northeast |
44% |
55% |
<1% |
1% |
| Pittsburgh area and West |
42% |
54% |
1% |
2% |
| Central and Northern Tier |
28% |
71% |
1% |
<1% |
| Income |
Less $50,000 |
59% |
37% |
1% |
3% |
| $50,000-$99,999 |
44% |
53% |
2% |
1% |
| $100,000 or more |
36% |
63% |
<1% |
1% |
| Income |
Less than $50,000 |
59% |
37% |
1% |
3% |
| $50,000 or more |
39% |
58% |
1% |
1% |
| Race |
White |
41% |
57% |
1% |
1% |
| Non White |
76% |
20% |
<1% |
4% |
| Age |
Under 45 |
40% |
58% |
1% |
<1% |
| 45 or older |
47% |
49% |
1% |
3% |
| Gender |
Men |
40% |
56% |
1% |
3% |
| Women |
51% |
47% |
1% |
1% |
| Views of U.S. Economy |
The worst is yet to come |
25% |
72% |
1% |
3% |
| The worst is behind us |
67% |
31% |
1% |
1% |
| Obama Approval Rating |
Approve |
89% |
8% |
2% |
1% |
| Disapprove |
10% |
89% |
<1% |
1% |
| Interview Type |
Landline |
47% |
50% |
1% |
2% |
| Cell Phone |
41% |
57% |
<1% |
2% |
| October 30, 2010 Marist Poll Pennsylvania Likely Voters including early voters and those who are undecided yet leaning toward a candidate "N=461 MOE +/- 5%". Totals may not add to 100 due to rounding. |
|
